You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access.    
Australian Horse & Greyhound Racing Forum  

Go Back   Australian Horse & Greyhound Racing Forum > Offtopic Discussion > General Discussion
Register FAQ Racing Free Bets Members List Calendar Casino


General Discussion Discuss anything related to horse, harness and greyhound racing and sports betting

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2010, 11:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cradoc, Tas
Posts: 175
Default Accidential Positives!!! Chub

The Dogs - Pickering Suspended & Fined



unfortunatly I cannot comment on the original thread of all of this but one thing that I must say Chub, Sue comment to you regaurding this trainer

'IMO probably higher than 99% of the positives returned are accidental, for instance the last one you published was of a dog who ran 3rd at Coonamble and returned a positive result to Prednisolone and Prednisone which is an anti-inflammatory contained in many ointments, eardrops, eyedrops etc.'

now I dont claim to be a doc of any kind but I do know that Prednisolone is a steriod based drug and its use is for the lungs, as my mother suffering for emphsema and lung cancer this was one of the drugs that she used at the time it is also a controled drug, in the fact that to even get a script for this your doc had to ring and get the number they cant just write a script so for the chance that it is used in oinments as Sue has pointed out there isnt a chance in hell!

Also a friend if mine recently got done for a positive to KETOPROFEN, which is a last ditch drug used on cows when they dont know what is wrong with them, is that fails they are then sent off to the knackery, this particular one in VIC has gotten to date 4 or 5 trainers suspened all for the same drug altho this drug would have no adverse affects on a greys preformance it is still a drug and the rule reads that you must present a drug free dog, and that goes for any drug, this is something that needs to be change, the same as most atheletes, preformance enhansing drugs, there needs to be a prohibeted drug list, cause as of now it is any drug not just certain ones

mind you my friend, small trainer, and impecable record got 3 months first offence

oh and the poppys in the bread lol what a joke, did they forget to fed the dog the bread and just give them a handful of poppys.....

enough with the bull excuses already and people falling for it, there is no place for cheats in greyhound racing......
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2010, 11:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cradoc, Tas
Posts: 175
Default

ORIGINAL THREAD


it was in the meat then source another supplier but they dont they just keep buying CONTAMINATED meat from the same source it was in the bread then dont feed bread my kennel hand he/she was smoking x and injecting x and snorting x but once i found out they were sacked picked up in the carpark the vet had powder on them when getting the sample my dog drank out of the same bowl as other runners a person in the crowd patted the dog and contaminated the dog now its in the kibble (since 1998 tests but is showing up now)the list is getting bigger and its usually the kennels with a rather big team coming up with it and most times only gets a fine a small trainer gets suspended and a fine and its usually repeat offenders who use the in the meat excuse i think now either authorities are sick of hearing these EXCUSES and find according to what they think and i believe if its happening a lot ?? why arent the suppliers put on notice about using DEAD meat in the processing of PET or GREYHOUND RACING MEAT by the revelant authorities who licence them cheers chub.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 05:01 AM
chub
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tasmania
Posts: 108
Default

and cocaine how does that get into a dogs system well ask nsw stewards its 11 months since a POSITIVE to COCAINE and no final action yet cheers chub.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 07:16 AM
penny
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: victoria
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chub View Post
and cocaine how does that get into a dogs system well ask nsw stewards its 11 months since a POSITIVE to COCAINE and no final action yet cheers chub.
is it because money talks and bullshit walks ???????????????????? .
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 08:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cradoc, Tas
Posts: 175
Default

Lol oh no chub it's been dealt with lol hell I would love to know how all of a sudden it wasn't mr lords prob Anymore and someone else took the rap how do they justify that it's black and white in the rule book
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:39 PM
chub
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tasmania
Posts: 108
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyleigh View Post
Lol oh no chub it's been dealt with lol hell I would love to know how all of a sudden it wasn't mr lords prob Anymore and someone else took the rap how do they justify that it's black and white in the rule book
i think you will find that this isnt finalised yet thats why i asked i believe a mr dickenson is seeking legal advice cheers chub.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 06:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cradoc, Tas
Posts: 175
Default

my mistake, I just spoke to a mate in NSW and she said the same thing, Dickenson is taking the rap but its not finilised yet...I just still dont get how you can basically transfer your f*ck up into someone elses name, it boggles me
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 08:01 PM
penny
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: victoria
Posts: 57
Default

the dog was apparently changed from a lord to s dickenson 3 days before it raced nsw are a bloody disgrace 11months and a positive yet to be finalised .
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2010, 11:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cradoc, Tas
Posts: 175
Default

And the dog is still racing why was the rule changed for thAt dog, they both train out of the same kennel but when the offence was committed he was still in lords name
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2010, 04:59 AM
chub
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tasmania
Posts: 108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyleigh View Post
And the dog is still racing why was the rule changed for thAt dog, they both train out of the same kennel but when the offence was committed he was still in lords name
different states different rules so much for getting uniformity in ALL states it will NEVER HAPPEN cheers chub.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger
$50 Free Bet